Ever since the ancient xeroxians invented graphical user interfaces, programmers have wanted to make GUI programming ever easier for themselves. Solutions started simple. When GUIs appeared on PC desktops, practically all screens were of the VGA type and fixed into 640x480 size. Mac or X Window System on UNIX were not much different. Everyone was so happy with such awesome graphics resolutions that they never thought that an application would have to work on a radically different screen size. At worst, screens could only grow, they thought, giving more space for more windows. In the 80s, the idea of having a computer screen in your pocket was simply not realistic. Hence, the GUI APIs allowed placing UI components using screen coordinates. Visual Basic and other horribilities provided an easy way for the designer to drag and drop components on a fixed-sized window. One would have thought that at least translators had complained about the awkwardness of such a solution, but apparently they were not, as non-engineers, heard or at least cared about. At best, engineers could throw at them a resource editor that would allow them to resize the UI components by hand. Such was the spirit back then.

After the web was born, layout design was doomed to change for ever. At first, layout didn't matter much, as everyone was happy with plain headings, paragraphs, and a few hyperlinks here and there. Designers of HTML wanted the pages to run on any screen size. The screen size was actually not pixels but rows and columns of characters, as the baby web was really just hypertext, not graphics. That was soon to be changed. The first GUI-based browser, NCSA Mosaic, launched a revolution that culminated in Netscape Navigator. Suddenly, people who had previously been doing advertisement broshures started writing HTML. This meant that layout design had to be easy not just for programmers, but also allow the graphics designer do his or her job without having to know a thing about programming. The W3C committee designing web standards came up with the CSS (Cascading Style Sheet) specification, which allowed trivial separation of appearance from content. Later versions of HTML followed, XHTML appeared, as did countless other standards.

Page description and markup languages are a wonderful solution for static presentations, such as books and most web pages. Real applications, however, need to have more control. They need to be able to change the state of user interface components and even their layout on the run. This creates a need to separate the presentation from content from exactly the right level.

Thanks to the attack of graphics designers, desktop applications were, when it comes to appearance, far behind web design. Sun Microsystems had come in 1995 with a new programming language, Java, for writing cross-platform desktop applications. Java's original graphical user interface toolkit, AWT (Abstract Windowing Toolkit), was designed to work on multiple operating systems as well as embedded in web browsers. One of the special aspects of AWT was the layout manager, which allowed user interface components to be flexible, growing and shrinking as they needed. This made it possible for the user to resize the windows of an application flexibly and also served the needs of localization, as text strings were not limited to some fixed size in pixels. It became even possible to resize the pixel size of fonts, and the rest of the layout adapted to the new size.

Layout management of IT Mill Toolkit is a direct successor of the web-based concept for separation of content and appearance and of the Java AWT solution for binding the layout and user interface components into objects in programs. IT Mill Toolkit layout components allow you to position your UI components on the screen in a hierarchical fashion, much like in conventional Java UI toolkits such as AWT, Swing, or SWT. In addition, you can approach the layout from the direction of the web with the CustomLayout component, which you can use to write your layout as a template in XHTML that provides locations of any contained components.

The moral of the story is that, because IT Mill Toolkit is intended for web applications, appearance is of high importance. The solutions have to be the best of both worlds and satisfy artist of the both kind: code and graphics. On the API side, layout is controlled by UI components, particularly the layout components. On the visual side, it is controlled by themes. Themes can contain any HTML, CSS, and JavaScript that you or your web artists create to make people feel good about your software.